Understanding Behavioral Theory

The Basics of Behavioral Theory

Think of behavioral theory as an approach to understand how leaders behave. Break the term down. “Behavioral” is related to ‘behavior,’ referring to the way leaders act or conduct themselves. 

Behavioral theory suggests that leadership is not something you’re born with; it’s learned as you grow. It’s a theory brought to life in the mid-20th century, which believes characteristics of great leaders aren’t fixed but are adaptable. The rules are quite simple – anyone can learn to be a good leader!

The Two Types of Behavioral Leadership Approaches

Behavioral theorists have identified two main leadership styles:

  1. Task-oriented: This style mainly focuses on getting the job done. Think of it as a task manager. It’s all about maintaining organization, clarity of jobs, and successful completion of tasks.
  2. Relationship-oriented: As the name suggests, it’s about building good relationships. It concentrates on team building, motivation, and group cooperation.
Application of Behavioral Theory to Leadership

Let’s look at a couple of examples:

  1. Steve Jobs, known for his hands-on approach, was arguably a task-oriented Leader. He was meticulous about every detail and obsessed with perfection. This behavior has been credited with Apple’s unprecedented success in the tech industry.
  2. On the other side, we have Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, known more for his relationship-oriented leadership style. Pichai is renowned for his collaborative work environment and his focus on nurturing talent.

Both are successful, yes? Yes. But they’ve applied different approaches to leadership. This is the beauty of behavioral theory, it gives flexibility, choosing the style that best fits your own personality and the situation.

In practical terms, this theory suggests that a good understanding of your team’s strength, weaknesses, and dynamics is crucial. Adaptability is key to successful leadership.

Behavioral Theory in a Nutshell

In essence, the behavioral theory believes that great leaders are made, not born. It revolves around the idea that leadership behavior can be learned.

Whether it’s focusing on the task or nurturing relationships, both approaches have their merits. It’s all about knowing your team, understanding their needs, and adjusting your style to bring out the best in them.

Remember, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Effective leadership is about adaptability and emotional intelligence.

An image of two businesspeople shaking hands, representing good relationships and effective leadership.

Strengths of Behavioral Leadership

Let’s outline the strengths of the behavioral leadership approach.

A Person-Centric Approach

Behavioral leadership focuses on individuals and their behavior rather than solely on tasks, making it a people-centric approach. This allows leaders to motivate their teams, address their concerns and cultivate a positive work environment.

In return, this often leads to higher job satisfaction, increased productivity, and even foster employee loyalty. Plus, those following behavioral leadership methods can adjust their behavior according to their team’s needs, ensuring that every team member is supported.

Development of Strong Teams

This style of leadership emphasizes collaboration and teamwork. Behavioral leaders often focus on building strong relationships among team members, promoting open communication, cooperation, and shared responsibility. This strong team dynamic can boost morale, productivity, and enhance the organization’s overall performance.

Flexibility in Leadership

Flexibility is a key strength of this leadership style. These leaders can adapt their approach to be either task-oriented or relationship-oriented depending on the situation.

For instance, during a project launch, they may lean more towards a task-oriented style to ensure things stay on track. But after completion, they may switch to a relationship-oriented style to appreciate the team’s efforts and restore balance.

Continuous Improvement

Behavioral leadership allows for continuous development. Its premise is that great leaders are not just born but can be made through learning and understanding behaviors. Hence, it encourages ongoing learning and personal growth that can lead to improved leadership skills over time.

Plus, with a heightened focus on emotional intelligence in leadership, behavioral leaders are in a unique position to understand and guide their team’s emotions towards singular goals or projects.

Image depicting behavioral leadership approach, showing teamwork, collaboration, and adaptability

Behavioral Leadership in Practice

Leadership Styles: Democratic and Autocratic

Applying the behavioral theory lens, you’ll find two common styles of leadership – democratic and autocratic.

Think of democratic leaders as those who value team input and participation in decision-making – a kind of open-door policy.

For instance, Bill Gates is known for this approach at Microsoft; he encourages employees to voice their ideas and fosters a culture of innovation.

On the other hand, autocratic leaders make decisions independently, typically based on expertise or personal judgement. Consider Martha Stewart, who built a lifestyle empire with this style.

Applying Behavioral Theory: Encouraging Positive Behavior

Leaders can use behavioral theory techniques such as positive reinforcement to encourage desirable behavior among team members. Just like rewarding a pet for doing a trick, acknowledging an employee’s good performance with perks or praise can fortify their productiveness and job satisfaction.

Ever wonder why Google offers free gourmet meals and other benefits? It’s not just generosity; it’s a clever ploy to boost employee morale and productivity.

Embracing Feedback: Constructive Criticism and Self-Improvement

The behavioral theory argues that feedback is a valuable tool for enhancing performance and growth. Leaders, too, can benefit from feedback sessions, facilitating opportunities to reflect on their leadership style. Think of Elon Musk of Tesla and SpaceX; he reportedly asks his team for regular feedback to better his management approach.

Adapting Leadership Styles: A Behavioral Approach

Just as no two employees are the same, not all situations call for the same leadership style. An effective leader shifts between task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors depending on what the situation demands.

For instance, a crisis may call for an autocratic approach for quick decisions, while team-building exercises might benefit more from democratic leadership. This fluid approach narrows the gap between leadership theory and practical application in real-world settings.

Combating Resistance: The Role of Behavioral Theory

Change is often met with resistance. It’s an upheaval of comfort zones. So, how do leaders manage this? Understanding and managing people’s behavior is key.

By using an understanding of behavioral theory, leaders can anticipate resistance and develop plans to address it.

Consider Lou Gerstner, the man who turned IBM around amid great resistance. His secret? He understood that he wasn’t just reprogramming computers, but changing human behavior.

Emphasizing the People, Not Just the Work

Finally, the cornerstone of behavioral theory in leadership is its focus on people. By understanding behavioral dynamics, leaders can cultivate a work environment that respects individuality and harnesses the power of diversity.

An example can be Tony Hsieh’s strategy at Zappos, where he prioritized corporate culture to drive his company’s success.


Image of a diverse group of people collaborating and discussing together in a workplace setting.

Challenges and Limitations of Behavioral Leadership

One Size Does Not Fit All

An immediate challenge to keep in mind is that the effectiveness of behavioral leadership is not universal. Different organizations, teams, and individuals will require varied leadership approaches.

The idea that one can use a ‘cookie-cutter’ approach for effective leadership can fall short in practice.

For instance, let’s say a leader is incredibly task-focused and excels in a fast-paced environment like a financial trading firm. If they were to transition to leading a team developing software, they might struggle due to the more iterative and flexible development process where relationship-oriented leadership might be more beneficial.

Adapting Leadership Styles is not a Cakewalk

Switching between leadership styles, based on the situation and team dynamics, is easier said than done. Leaders may naturally lean towards being either task-oriented or relationship-oriented. Running counter to that inherent disposition can be quite challenging, requiring significant awareness, flexibility, and effort.

Time Investment

Behavioral leadership, specifically the relationship-oriented style, requires significant time investment. Establishing genuine relationships with team members, fostering teamwork, and understanding personal and group dynamics are not instantaneous processes. In high-stress or time-sensitive environments, this can be particularly challenging.

Potential for Misinterpretation

The fluidity of behavioral leadership also carries the risk of being misunderstood. For example, leaders alternating between task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors could confuse team members who might misconstrue the leader’s intent. If not executed mindfully, it can lead to reduced trust between the leader and the team.

Hard to Measure and Quantify

Unlike quantitative metrics like sales figures or output rates, it’s difficult to directly measure the success of leadership behaviors. This can make it hard for leaders to assess and adjust their leadership styles effectively.

Risk of Extreme Behaviors

It’s also vital to remember that too much of either leadership style can have negative consequences. Overemphasis on task-orientation can lead to neglect of team welfare, burnout, and high turnover rates. On the other hand, excessive focus on relationships might lead to complacency, reduced accountability, and hindered productivity.

Image depicting the challenges and limitations of behavioral leadership, showing a maze with multiple paths and obstacles, representing the complexities of leadership.

Scroll to Top